-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 29-09-16 11:59, Filip Pytloun wrote:
> Hello Dennis,
> 
> I was working on packages for Ubuntu Xenial but failed with
> following: https://bugs.launchpad.net/opencontrail/+bug/1603881
> 
> Anyway my opinion is that packaging should be finally done in
> Debian way to have official packages in Debian/Ubuntu
> distributions. That will require some changes in current build
> tools and code of some components, mostly to get rid of patched
> third-party dependencies bundled in packages and other junk. This
> is currently not possible to be done without Juniper cooperation 
> and they have no intention to make packaging better. Anyway I
> expect this is going to change soon as new users are comming and
> having the same issue - packages.
> 
> Filip

Hi Filip,

I agree that the packaging should be done according to the Debian
guidelines. The support for Ubuntu is then (almost) automatic.

Third-party bundling and generally not caring about packaging is a
common pattern with new developments. Are the Juniper developers
subscribed to this list? Is there some way you know to open up that
discussion?

Dennis

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=VGmF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org

Reply via email to