2
On 20.09.2017 00:34, Gasparakis, Joseph wrote:
Hi all,
Transitioning into an open source model it makes sense for Juniper to
have for the first public release more control than others since they
have all the knowledge and it makes sense for them to be able to prevent
radical architectural changes.
In the last TSC WG call we came up with a few proposals:
1.Allow someone in Juniper have veto powers to reject a proposed change
2.Create an Architectural Review Board (ARB as defined in
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zNIVEOY3XsnUdYKy1ddwgjJoOV-Iwx1pHU_8ViYlTFs/edit)
that will be reviewing in order to accept or reject architectural
proposals, and Juniper to have the majority of the seats so they can
control by the power of majority what goes in and what not.
If we decide for 2, we can choose at a later stage if we will have an
ARB ongoing or only for this first release.
Please vote one of the two options and for the sake of openness and
transparency REPLY ALL so your vote is visible to the whole list. If I
receive any private votes I will be forwarding them to this list.
Also please vote by end of day today as we would like to have this
decision made during the summit tomorrow.
Regards,
Joseph
--
intel-logo-small
Joseph Gasparakis
Intel Corporation
Networking Platforms Group
Architecture Division
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.opencontrail.org
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.opencontrail.org
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
