#2 On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Gasparakis, Joseph < joseph.gaspara...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > > > Transitioning into an open source model it makes sense for Juniper to have > for the first public release more control than others since they have all > the knowledge and it makes sense for them to be able to prevent radical > architectural changes. > > > > In the last TSC WG call we came up with a few proposals: > > > > 1. Allow someone in Juniper have veto powers to reject a proposed > change > > 2. Create an Architectural Review Board (ARB as defined in > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zNIVEOY3XsnUdYKy1ddwgjJoOV- > Iwx1pHU_8ViYlTFs/edit) that will be reviewing in order to accept or > reject architectural proposals, and Juniper to have the majority of the > seats so they can control by the power of majority what goes in and what > not. > > > > If we decide for 2, we can choose at a later stage if we will have an ARB > ongoing or only for this first release. > > > > Please vote one of the two options and for the sake of openness and > transparency REPLY ALL so your vote is visible to the whole list. If I > receive any private votes I will be forwarding them to this list. > > > > Also please vote by end of day today as we would like to have this > decision made during the summit tomorrow. > > > > Regards, > > > > Joseph > > > > -- > > [image: intel-logo-small] > > Joseph Gasparakis > > Intel Corporation > > Networking Platforms Group > > Architecture Division > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev@lists.opencontrail.org > http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org > >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.opencontrail.org http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
