Hi Randy, > To recap, we’re in the process of creating a vehicle that would allow community-led governance > of OpenContrail. That process will result in some kind of entity, besides Juniper, that owns the > governance, codebase, and related trademarks.
Let's assume the new name for community OpenContrail is XYZ. Can you answer few simple questions yet very critical to the future of both community XYZ & Juniper's Contrail: * If community adds new features to XYZ is Juniper/Contrail engineering going to sync it into the internal Contrail branch such that *all* such features are part of it ? * If Juniper engineering/PMs add a new feature or bug fix to Juniper's Contrail will it get also commited to community XYZ branch ? * Who and how will decided what goes into what branch ? * If there is no 100% of feature and bug fix party how are you going to make sure both XYZ & Contrail are even interoperable ? * Is Juniper going to internally keep texting community XYZ version ? Many thx, Robert.
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
