-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El 07/01/2013 14:06, Micha? Mas?owski escribió: > Hello. I have written a new draft of the package freedom guidelines > based on the discussion at [0]. I have also added a new section based > on [1] (the mail contains a justification of option G). > > [0] https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/pipermail/dev/2012-December/thread.html#1037 > [1] https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/pipermail/dev/2013-January/001056.html > > Specific variants to choose > =========================== > > - A, B or C text of the license rules. > > - D or E. E needs history rewriting, write if you want to do it if > you choose this option. > > - F or G. > > - H or I, not needed if A. > > Some other sections might be controversial (e.g. source inclusion and > build from source requirements), I assume they are supported unless > there are specific comments against them. > > (There probably are also many opportunities for wording improvements.) > > My motivation and explanation of the TeXLive and GNU exceptions > =============================================================== > > I want these rules to be possible to comply with, without ignoring > many potential problems. I believe it is better to explicitly state > the compromises that we make. > > My other motivation is to help make a blacklist rewrite similar to the > one that we discussed before, to make it easier to find why we blacklist > some packages and to share this information with other distros. > > Package freedom guidelines wiki page draft > ========================================== > > These guidelines document our interpretation of what software should not > be included in the distribution according to the > [[Parabola/GNU_Linux_Social_Contract]] and how the included software > should be provided. > > A. == License rules for source and binary packages == > > All nontrivial non-license works should be > [https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html free software] or > [http://freedomdefined.org/Definition free cultural works] unless they > are correctly GNU FDL-licensed documentation ("correctly" implies that > e.g. a manual that consists only of invariant sections isn't accepted) > or GNU packages (with e.g. nonmodifiable works of opinion). > > B. == License rules for source and binary packages == > > All nontrivial non-license works should be > [https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html free software] or > [http://freedomdefined.org/Definition free cultural works]. > > Source packages might contain correctly GNU FDL-licensed documentation > ("correctly" implies that e.g. a manual that consists only of > invariant sections isn't accepted) or, if they are GNU packages, > nonmodifiable works of opinion which are not included in the binary > packages. >
I'm not agree with this point. We have good and practicals reasons to allow only free software on our repositories, however, any asset under a CC No Derivate and/or CC No commercial license clauses doesn't qualifies as a "free cultural work", assets aren't software, therefore they aren't under the same requirements as software does. My concern about assets under a CC No commercial license clause combined with free software is different because I'm unsure if such material will make illegal to sell the asset(s) within the free software binaries as a whole. No one on CC answered such concern yet... - -- Jorge Araya Navarro Universitario, idealista y activista del Software Libre. Siquirres, Limón, Costa Rica. http://swt.encyclomundi.net Diaspora*: http://diasp.org/u/shackra identi.ca: http://parlementum.net/sweet Jabber: [email protected] Skype: ¡De ninguna manera, tras de privativo, te espían!. El software privativo en GNU/Linux, al igual que en Windows o en MacOs, te hace un ser no-libre. Deja de engañarte, ¡¡despierta ahora!!: http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html http://replicant.us/about/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ6yzZAAoJEL2tlgXwaqO7F6sH/j7DHTHH44Pyhn86eiATcBLC EzD1bZz/h6lvpoBqHvS98KTbxxds8Wp9P/RCPtR+BQpOEp3WZujlHVC2XzK2RsSx +uJHV/M3k6UrLFgvqekz+BRRiLCED69BYsIx+RnLTkWC4hHXDIclTBEN706HlnZ2 vBkFxbeqtAMxOY8kNGj4iWHGWRRyIdP9FewQcr4QeCr1VRHOWSgIOCS9jKe/TSdr SIhxsuXVm7UgBu806qLxd3Xuux9aPY+4MfQDDan5EEP2LNSYzhQD+Ktt/qlunnDb puvo4DQ+Q9Q3Qk+c86qlh62Ag5I1NMtWUspGVavU0Gi3fCec9xVsUZ0naaQt5HE= =PVlI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
