Michał Masłowski <[email protected]> writes: > A. == License rules for source and binary packages == > > All nontrivial non-license works should be > [https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html free software] or > [http://freedomdefined.org/Definition free cultural works] unless they > are correctly GNU FDL-licensed documentation ("correctly" implies that > e.g. a manual that consists only of invariant sections isn't accepted) > or GNU packages (with e.g. nonmodifiable works of opinion).
are there other packages where works of opinion are included? > G. == Naming of replacement packages == > > 1. If we change upstream "a" to "b", change "a" to "b" in the name. > 2. If the resulting package cannot be used instead of the original > package, change its name so users will know this and other packages > won't use it. > > Many existing replacement packages have different names, they should > not be changed just for this rule. i don't understand g -- .oO)
pgp_Z2ujsTYwr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
