yesterday someone in #parabola reported that some packages from the base group were failing because of invalid signatures. it turned out to be that the info in the database was right but the package was not: they came directly from arch.
after fixing the problem, today vim-runtime was reported so i checked all package replacements from blacklist.txt (i found a couple syntax errors too) and i found the following packages were signed by arch devs: arj enscript gummiboot hardinfo lame lsb-release maven mkisolinux mkpxelinux mksyslinux psi reflector syslinux usermin vim-runtime webmin xsp most of them are rebranding issues, except for lame. please reupload your versions with pkgrel+0.1 so people who already installed them upgrade to the correct versions. i'll start with lame. -- http://partidopirata.com.ar
pgp0ZrSlN7jaH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
