As there was still no reply to the attached message of Jan 19th yet, I'd
just like to mention that this issue does still persist in 1.0-git (just
verified it).
It should be easy to fix, if my assumption stated at the end of the
attached message should be correct. It's IMO just a counting error.
The reason why I forwarded the message as an attachment (rather than
quoting it inline) is that I wanted to make sure that the line wrapping
doesn't get f*cked up even more and that the format will be exactly
preserved.
As I'm still running against this wall several times a day, a fix would be
welcome and highly appreciated.
I'm BTW seeing a similar behaviour upon editing a draft message, but
hopefully this will have the same cause, so I'll just wait until this
particular forwarding issue will be fixed. Should it then still apply to
draft messages as well, I'll of course report.
The entire thread can be read in the RCU list.
Cheers (and thanks again to all developers of the best webmail client
ever),
--
Michael Heydekamp
Co-Admin freexp.de
Düsseldorf/Germany
--- Begin Message ---
Am 18.01.2013 20:29, schrieb Thomas Bruederli:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:13 AM, Michael Heydekamp <[email protected]>
wrote:
The message quoted below sounds ridiculous, as both texts do look exacly
the same. The reason apparently is that I copied the first paragraph from
the original mail being in the Sent folder, where the lines were wrapped
already after pos. #76 (so each line had an LF at the end).
So it wasn't a forward problem but rather copy & paste?
No. But see below.
But upon typing, everything is flowed in the editor and therefore there
are
no LFs at all. So here's how the first x'ed paragraph in the quoted mail
below should look like when you type it (and are using the settings
described further below):
You're writing about "the editor". Did you use the HTML editor or
plaintext mail composition?
In my initial post of this thread, I wrote:
------------------------------------------------
When I'm sending a plain text message [...]
------------------------------------------------
However, I generally fail to understand and reproduce your problem.
Could you describe exactly what you did step by step?
Sure. But first I'd like to suggest - no, I request - to make
'send_format_flowed' and 'line_length' user-configurable. To demonstrate the
issue in this post, I had to change 'send_format_flowed' to true, which no
normal user would be able to, as he hasn't access to main.inc.php.
Ok, here we go (required config settings 'send_format_flowed=false',
'line_length=76'):
Step #1 - we type this plain text:
----------------------------------
xxxäxxxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxäxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx. xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx xx.xx. xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx, xxxx xx xxx
xxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxx xxxxxxxx xxßxx, xxxxx xxx xxxxxx xxx xxxx xxx
xxxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx xxxxxxx xxxxxx "xxx xxx xxx xxxxxxx".
Step #2 - we send the message, it will be wrapped like this:
------------------------------------------------------------
xxxäxxxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxäxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx. xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx xx.xx. xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx, xxxx xx
xxx
xxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxx xxxxxxxx xxßxx, xxxxx xxx xxxxxx xxx xxxx xxx
xxxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx xxxxxxx xxxxxx "xxx xxx xxx xxxxxxx".
Note that line #2 has exactly 76 characters! So all correct.
Step #3 - we forward the message sent in step #2 inline to somebody else.
It will be loaded into the editor this way:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
xxxäxxxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxäxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx. xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx xx.xx. xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx, xxxx xx
xxx
xxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxx xxxxxxxx xxßxx, xxxxx xxx xxxxxx xxx xxxx xxx
xxxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx xxxxxxx xxxxxx "xxx xxx xxx xxxxxxx".
So still all correct - at least it looks so.
Step #4 - we send the forwarded message, but now it will be re-wrapped like
this:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
xxxäxxxx xxxxx xxx xxxxx xxxäxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx. xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx xx.xx. xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx, xxxx xx
xxx
xxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxx xxxxxxxx xxßxx, xxxxx xxx xxxxxx xxx xxxx xxx
xxxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx xxxxxxx xxxxxx "xxx xxx xxx xxxxxxx".
Look at lines #2 and #3. Now reproducable?
I believe this might be a simple counting problem: In step #2, RC is
counting characters only and inserts an LF after pos. 76. In step #4, RC
counts the already existing LF (which does not exist in step #2) as a
character. This needs to be fixed, if my assumption should be correct. LFs
shall not be counted as characters.
Reply highly appreciated.
Thanks and cheers,
--
Michael Heydekamp
Co-Admin freexp.de
Düsseldorf/Germany
_______________________________________________
Roundcube Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Roundcube Development discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
