On 09/18/2013 03:23 PM, David Deutsch wrote: > Credibility? Eternalize? What? Look - I'm just a FOSS coder and I don't > care how "professional" or whatever I come across.
Well, we do not care either, but we care about us and our project. > What I do care about is > an /honest/ track record that can be seen in my github profile, amongst > other things. Well, you have your repository with commits history, right? > More importantly though, I consider the price you would have to pay > smaller than the one I'm paying. So, we do not agree on that. > Anyways, I'm getting a sense that this is really mostly about commit > /messages/. Well alright then. What about if I simply rename those commits? > Would be a bit of rebasing, but from my count, there's only about 15 > commits that lack a good commit message. Would that be an agreeable > compromise? And add "Code style fixes: " prefix to all of them... But still I think the number of commits in PR#109 is not acceptable. -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl] Roundcube Webmail Developer [http://roundcube.net] --------------------------------------------------- PGP: 19359DC1 @@ GG: 2275252 @@ WWW: http://alec.pl _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
