On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:58:54AM -0700, Bryan Richter wrote: > No it isn't. :) > > There is now no SnowdriftProject type, nor should there ever be.
You're right, for some reason I thought there was. I think we had some discussion in the IRC channel about how to implement the mechanism if there was a separate SnowdriftProject type, so in my head I thought there was such a type. > Stephen is right; this is not an issue yet. The "/p/snowdrift" route > will go away, replaced by "/p/#ProjectSlug", and the snowdrift project > will be the obvious owner of the ProjectSlug that corresponds to the > route "/p/snowdrift". I'm a bit concerned about this part, because this sounds like it might be a difficult change. However, we can address this later. -- Peter Harpending <pe...@harpending.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.snowdrift.coop https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/dev
