On segunda-feira, 4 de novembro de 2013 17:16:36, Jussi Laako wrote:
> I meant it is obsolete from glib codebase point of view in a way that 
> glib doesn't depend on it and offers a built-in alternative. And 
> deprecated for glib-based applications.

That's a very narrow point of view. It doesn't include:

 * EFL-based applications, whose binding is based on libdbus-1
 * Qt-based applications, whose binding is also based on libdbus-1
 * older glib-based applications that use dbus-glib and haven't been ported
 * most system daemons, which are bindingless

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to