On 11/04/2013 04:49 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 4 de novembro de 2013 17:16:36, Jussi Laako wrote: >> I meant it is obsolete from glib codebase point of view in a way that >> glib doesn't depend on it and offers a built-in alternative. And >> deprecated for glib-based applications. > > That's a very narrow point of view. It doesn't include: > > * EFL-based applications, whose binding is based on libdbus-1 > * Qt-based applications, whose binding is also based on libdbus-1 > * older glib-based applications that use dbus-glib and haven't been ported
> * most system daemons, which are bindingless This is the thing that worries me most with respect to dbus-to-kdbus migration. There are "bindingless" daemons, there are things like dbus-java which implement everything on their own. We can handle subset of that for Tizen, but DBus ecosystem is far bigger than that... Cheers Karol _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
