Hello!

Kevin recently noticed and/or was told that it is no longer necessary to
have %manifest entries in the %files sections of a .spec file if the
default manifest is sufficient:

<manifest>
  <request>
    <domain name="_"/>
  </request>
</manifest>

Apparently builds in OBS add such a manifest automatically; experiments
confirm that. But can someone please also confirm that officially?
According to the Wiki, one has to add it explicitly:

https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/Security:SmackThreeDomainModel
        "Each Tizen package needs a manifest file."

If %manifest has become optional, then gbs needs to be fixed such that
it behaves like OBS: when compiling SyncEvolution with gbs  0.22.3,
files in e.g. /usr/bin from the resulting .rpm have the "User" label.
When installing the .rpm from OBS, they have "_" (as it should be).

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.



_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to