> -----Original Message----- > From: Dev [mailto:dev-boun...@lists.tizen.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Ohly > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 1:53 AM > To: Tizen Dev > Subject: [Dev] default Smack manifests > > Hello! > > Kevin recently noticed and/or was told that it is no longer necessary to > have %manifest entries in the %files sections of a .spec file if the > default manifest is sufficient: > > <manifest> > <request> > <domain name="_"/> > </request> > </manifest> > > Apparently builds in OBS add such a manifest automatically; experiments > confirm that. But can someone please also confirm that officially?
The official word is that every package needs a manifest. > According to the Wiki, one has to add it explicitly: > > https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/Security:SmackThreeDomainModel > "Each Tizen package needs a manifest file." > > If %manifest has become optional, then gbs needs to be fixed such that > it behaves like OBS: when compiling SyncEvolution with gbs 0.22.3, > files in e.g. /usr/bin from the resulting .rpm have the "User" label. > When installing the .rpm from OBS, they have "_" (as it should be). That's one of the reasons that we're still requiring the manifest file. > -- > Best Regards, Patrick Ohly > > The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although > I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way > represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak > on behalf of Intel on this matter. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev@lists.tizen.org > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.tizen.org https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
