Le 15/12/2014 10:14, Jussi Laako a écrit : > > Correct way would be to have a feature and depend on it. So both > pwdutils and the upcoming gumd wrapper scripts would say something > like "Provides: usertools" in their spec and any package requiring > these tools would say "Requires: usertools". This allows alternative > packages to provide same functionality. > I think that the best would be to provide a packages which provides adduser and addgroup facility via gumd. That specific package should only be required during image creation as a backward compatibility. It should in no way get in the image. Then we could use the build (OBS or Yocto) config to replace pwdutil by this new package.
Alternative would be to build pwdutil with the emulation when a "with_gumd" flag is enable. but it would likely drag adduser in the image what is a bad idea. Regards -- Dominig ar Foll Senior Software Architect Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
