Spark has a "create_release.sh" script, I wonder if that can be reused / adapted for Livy to make this easier in the future.
I tracked all the dependencies' licenses for the incubation proposal, if that helps; although I didn't have the actual text of the licenses there. On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just took a quick look at it, and here are some comments: > > Apache release requires source releases as described below > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages > > Binary releases can also be provided as a convenience for users: > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#compiled-packages > > > Also, for the binary artifact, I would list each included jar and it's > license type in the license file (see below as an example) > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/distribution/all/src/main/release/bin/LICENSE > > But note that, the source release artifact, which should not include any > dependency jars, should have the LICENSE file similar to what is in the > root of git today. > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Team, >> >> Today I cut a RC1 release based on branch-0.4, here is the link ( >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy/releases/tag/ >> v0.4.0-incubating-rc1 >> and https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/livy/), would you >> please help to test and verify. Thanks a lot and appreciate your help. >> >> Best regards, >> Saisai >> >> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Alex Bozarth <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> > Last comment on the INFRA JIRA seemed to indicate that they hit a snag >> > with the import over a week ago and he never got back to us after. He >> told >> > us to keep using the Cloudera JIRA until he successfully completed a test >> > import then we could re-export for him. >> > >> > >> > *Alex Bozarth* >> > Software Engineer >> > Spark Technology Center >> > ------------------------------ >> > *E-mail:* *ajboz...@us.ibm.com* <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> >> > *GitHub: **github.com/ajbozarth* <https://github.com/ajbozarth> >> > >> > >> > 505 Howard Street >> > San Francisco, CA 94105 >> > United States >> > >> > >> > >> > [image: Inactive hide details for Bikas Saha ---08/04/2017 07:22:50 >> > PM---Hi, Most of those jiras looked like bug fixes to me. Hence I t]Bikas >> > Saha ---08/04/2017 07:22:50 PM---Hi, Most of those jiras looked like bug >> > fixes to me. Hence I thought 0.4 could be a bug fix release. >> > >> > From: Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> >> > To: "dev@livy.incubator.apache.org" <dev@livy.incubator.apache.org> >> > Date: 08/04/2017 07:22 PM >> > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy >> > ------------------------------ >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > Most of those jiras looked like bug fixes to me. Hence I thought 0.4 >> could >> > be a bug fix release. But I am ok releasing the current state so users >> can >> > gets an Apache release to transition to. >> > >> > >> > Given that its still a new project, a shorter cadence would help make bug >> > fix releases available. >> > >> > >> > Btw, does anyone know whats holding up the Apache jira process? If not, I >> > can follow up on that. >> > >> > >> > Bikas >> > >> > ________________________________ >> > From: Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com> >> > Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 7:31:10 PM >> > To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy >> > >> > From my side 0.4 might be a feasible choice to release as for Apache. >> > Reverting all the features and release 0.3.1 is too time-consuming and >> not >> > so necessary. >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Alex Bozarth <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > @Bikas The list of JIRAs fixed in 0.4 is 50 long ( >> > > https://issues.cloudera.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D% >> > > 20LIVY%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4) so I'm wondering what you mean >> by >> > > not including feature work. Are you suggesting we revert some of the >> work >> > > for this release and the re-merge it later, or just that you would've >> > > preferred it that was released without new features, but are okay with >> > how >> > > it is anyway? If you're worried about adding features in the first >> Apache >> > > release should we also look at re-releasing 0.3.0 as 0.3.1-incubating >> or >> > > back support, personally I think it's not worth it. >> > > >> > > As for release cadence, so far we've seemed to shoot for a 6 month >> > cadence >> > > (was longer this time with the move to Apache) but I'd be fine moving >> to >> > a >> > > 4 month cadence. I also prefer a time based release. >> > > >> > > >> > > *Alex Bozarth* >> > > Software Engineer >> > > Spark Technology Center >> > > ------------------------------ >> > > *E-mail:* *ajboz...@us.ibm.com* <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> >> > > *GitHub: **github.com/ajbozarth* <https://github.com/ajbozarth> >> > > >> > > >> > > 505 Howard Street >> > > San Francisco, CA 94105 >> > > United States >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > [image: Inactive hide details for Bikas Saha ---08/03/2017 12:56:59 >> > > PM---Hi, My preference would have been to not do a feature >> bearing]Bikas >> > > Saha ---08/03/2017 12:56:59 PM---Hi, My preference would have been to >> not >> > > do a feature bearing first release so that users could safe >> > > >> > > From: Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> >> > > To: "dev@livy.incubator.apache.org" <dev@livy.incubator.apache.org> >> > > Date: 08/03/2017 12:56 PM >> > > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy >> > > ------------------------------ >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > >> > > My preference would have been to not do a feature bearing first release >> > so >> > > that users could safely and painlessly migrate to the Apache release. >> > > Adding features increases the risk of regressions etc. >> > > >> > > >> > > However it seems like the web UI would be a relatively independent >> > feature >> > > that would not affect the core stability. So it may be fine to include >> > that >> > > in the first release as a new feature. In some ways, it gives users an >> > > incentive to move to the Apache release. >> > > >> > > >> > > +1 for getting the first release out as soon as feasible. And doing >> core >> > > feature work in follow up release. >> > > >> > > >> > > On this note, it would be good to consider the question of release >> > > cadence. Should we move to a 3 month or 4 month release cadence such >> that >> > > release trains are available for features to out when the features are >> > > ready. Or should do feature releases such that releases come out when >> > major >> > > new functionality has added. My preference is a time based release >> > cadence >> > > because it provides regular bug and security related fixes available >> in a >> > > released form for end users. >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks! >> > > >> > > Bikas >> > > >> > > >> > > ________________________________ >> > > From: Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com> >> > > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 8:34:03 PM >> > > To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org >> > > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy >> > > >> > > OK, thanks! Let's get this merged then prepare to the first Apache >> > release. >> > > >> > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Alex Bozarth <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > There's two open PRs on the livy repo with a follow-up PR on the >> > website >> > > > repo: >> > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy/pull/25 <- Web UI Log Page >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy/pull/26 <- Ability to build >> > > Livy >> > > > Docs >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy-website/pull/7 <- Add Livy >> > Docs >> > > > to Website (it may actually be better to update this and merge it >> after >> > > the >> > > > release) >> > > > >> > > > Once the Log Page PR is merged the basic Web UI is complete, the >> > > remaining >> > > > UI JIRAs are feature adds and tests that can come in the next >> release. >> > > > >> > > > *Alex Bozarth* >> > > > Software Engineer >> > > > Spark Technology Center >> > > > ------------------------------ >> > > > *E-mail:* *ajboz...@us.ibm.com* <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> >> > > > *GitHub: **github.com/ajbozarth* <https://github.com/ajbozarth> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > 505 Howard Street >> > > > San Francisco, CA 94105 >> > > > United States >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Saisai Shao ---07/31/2017 07:12:11 >> > > > PM---Hi Alex, can you please list the JIRAs for UI related works >> > y]Saisai >> > > > Shao ---07/31/2017 07:12:11 PM---Hi Alex, can you please list the >> JIRAs >> > > for >> > > > UI related works you want to merge in 0.4 release? >> > > > >> > > > From: Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com> >> > > > To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org >> > > > Date: 07/31/2017 07:12 PM >> > > > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy >> > > > ------------------------------ >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Hi Alex, can you please list the JIRAs for UI related works you want >> to >> > > > merge in 0.4 release? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks >> > > > >> > > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Alex Bozarth <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > After some tweaking and opening of PRs today, I'll change my vote >> to >> > a >> > > +1 >> > > > > with the inclusion of my currently open PRs. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > *Alex Bozarth* >> > > > > Software Engineer >> > > > > Spark Technology Center >> > > > > ------------------------------ >> > > > > *E-mail:* *ajboz...@us.ibm.com* <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> >> > > > > *GitHub: **github.com/ajbozarth* <https://github.com/ajbozarth> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > 505 Howard Street >> > > > > San Francisco, CA 94105 >> > > > > United States >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for "Alex Bozarth" ---07/28/2017 >> > 01:01:16 >> > > > > PM---I'm a +0 on this, I think we should get in a release >> soon,]"Alex >> > > > > Bozarth" ---07/28/2017 01:01:16 PM---I'm a +0 on this, I think we >> > > should >> > > > > get in a release soon, but I'm not sure if we should wait until >> > > > > >> > > > > From: "Alex Bozarth" <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> >> > > > > To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org >> > > > > Date: 07/28/2017 01:01 PM >> > > > > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy >> > > > > ------------------------------ >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > I'm a +0 on this, I think we should get in a release soon, but I'm >> > not >> > > > > sure if we should wait until the Web UI and Documentation are >> > finished >> > > > > (tracking in *LIVY-87* <https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/LIVY-87 >> > >> > > and >> > > > > *LIVY-384* <https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/LIVY-384>). If >> others >> > > are >> > > > > fine releasing with these feature partially complete then I'll be >> > okay >> > > as >> > > > > well. >> > > > > >> > > > > *Alex Bozarth* >> > > > > Software Engineer >> > > > > Spark Technology Center >> > > > > ------------------------------ >> > > > > *E-mail:* *ajboz...@us.ibm.com* <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> >> > > > > *GitHub: **github.com/ajbozarth* <https://github.com/ajbozarth> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > 505 Howard Street >> > > > > San Francisco, CA 94105 >> > > > > United States >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Jeff Zhang ---07/28/2017 01:12:24 AM---+1 for making the first >> apache >> > > > > release. Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com>于2017年7月28日周五 >> 下午3:42写道： >> > > > > >> > > > > From: Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> >> > > > > To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org >> > > > > Date: 07/28/2017 01:12 AM >> > > > > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy >> > > > > ------------------------------ >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 for making the first apache release. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com>于2017年7月28日周五 下午3:42写道： >> > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Team, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > We have already done most of the migration works to Apache, I >> think >> > > it >> > > > > > would be better to have a first Apache release based on the >> current >> > > > code. >> > > > > > What do you think? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks >> > > > > > Saisai >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ -- Marcelo
