There is also a simpler script for creating a release at bahir, it was inspired by the Spark one.
https://github.com/apache/bahir/blob/master/dev/release-build.sh On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Marcelo for your comments. I checked create_release.sh in Spark, I > think I will adopt this after this first release, for this first release I > would like to do each step in person. > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > Spark has a "create_release.sh" script, I wonder if that can be reused > > / adapted for Livy to make this easier in the future. > > > > I tracked all the dependencies' licenses for the incubation proposal, > > if that helps; although I didn't have the actual text of the licenses > > there. > > > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Just took a quick look at it, and here are some comments: > > > > > > Apache release requires source releases as described below > > > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages > > > > > > Binary releases can also be provided as a convenience for users: > > > http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#compiled-packages > > > > > > > > > Also, for the binary artifact, I would list each included jar and it's > > > license type in the license file (see below as an example) > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/ > > trunk/distribution/all/src/main/release/bin/LICENSE > > > > > > But note that, the source release artifact, which should not include > any > > > dependency jars, should have the LICENSE file similar to what is in the > > > root of git today. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Team, > > >> > > >> Today I cut a RC1 release based on branch-0.4, here is the link ( > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy/releases/tag/ > > >> v0.4.0-incubating-rc1 > > >> and https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/livy/), would > you > > >> please help to test and verify. Thanks a lot and appreciate your help. > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> Saisai > > >> > > >> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Alex Bozarth <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > Last comment on the INFRA JIRA seemed to indicate that they hit a > snag > > >> > with the import over a week ago and he never got back to us after. > He > > >> told > > >> > us to keep using the Cloudera JIRA until he successfully completed a > > test > > >> > import then we could re-export for him. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > *Alex Bozarth* > > >> > Software Engineer > > >> > Spark Technology Center > > >> > ------------------------------ > > >> > *E-mail:* *ajboz...@us.ibm.com* <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> > > >> > *GitHub: **github.com/ajbozarth* <https://github.com/ajbozarth> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > 505 Howard Street > > >> > San Francisco, CA 94105 > > >> > United States > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > [image: Inactive hide details for Bikas Saha ---08/04/2017 07:22:50 > > >> > PM---Hi, Most of those jiras looked like bug fixes to me. Hence I > > t]Bikas > > >> > Saha ---08/04/2017 07:22:50 PM---Hi, Most of those jiras looked like > > bug > > >> > fixes to me. Hence I thought 0.4 could be a bug fix release. > > >> > > > >> > From: Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> > > >> > To: "dev@livy.incubator.apache.org" <dev@livy.incubator.apache.org> > > >> > Date: 08/04/2017 07:22 PM > > >> > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy > > >> > ------------------------------ > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Hi, > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Most of those jiras looked like bug fixes to me. Hence I thought 0.4 > > >> could > > >> > be a bug fix release. But I am ok releasing the current state so > users > > >> can > > >> > gets an Apache release to transition to. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Given that its still a new project, a shorter cadence would help > make > > bug > > >> > fix releases available. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Btw, does anyone know whats holding up the Apache jira process? If > > not, I > > >> > can follow up on that. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Bikas > > >> > > > >> > ________________________________ > > >> > From: Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com> > > >> > Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 7:31:10 PM > > >> > To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org > > >> > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy > > >> > > > >> > From my side 0.4 might be a feasible choice to release as for > Apache. > > >> > Reverting all the features and release 0.3.1 is too time-consuming > and > > >> not > > >> > so necessary. > > >> > > > >> > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Alex Bozarth <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > @Bikas The list of JIRAs fixed in 0.4 is 50 long ( > > >> > > https://issues.cloudera.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D% > > >> > > 20LIVY%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.4) so I'm wondering what you > > mean > > >> by > > >> > > not including feature work. Are you suggesting we revert some of > the > > >> work > > >> > > for this release and the re-merge it later, or just that you > > would've > > >> > > preferred it that was released without new features, but are okay > > with > > >> > how > > >> > > it is anyway? If you're worried about adding features in the first > > >> Apache > > >> > > release should we also look at re-releasing 0.3.0 as > > 0.3.1-incubating > > >> or > > >> > > back support, personally I think it's not worth it. > > >> > > > > >> > > As for release cadence, so far we've seemed to shoot for a 6 month > > >> > cadence > > >> > > (was longer this time with the move to Apache) but I'd be fine > > moving > > >> to > > >> > a > > >> > > 4 month cadence. I also prefer a time based release. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > *Alex Bozarth* > > >> > > Software Engineer > > >> > > Spark Technology Center > > >> > > ------------------------------ > > >> > > *E-mail:* *ajboz...@us.ibm.com* <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> > > >> > > *GitHub: **github.com/ajbozarth* <https://github.com/ajbozarth> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > 505 Howard Street > > >> > > San Francisco, CA 94105 > > >> > > United States > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > [image: Inactive hide details for Bikas Saha ---08/03/2017 > 12:56:59 > > >> > > PM---Hi, My preference would have been to not do a feature > > >> bearing]Bikas > > >> > > Saha ---08/03/2017 12:56:59 PM---Hi, My preference would have been > > to > > >> not > > >> > > do a feature bearing first release so that users could safe > > >> > > > > >> > > From: Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> > > >> > > To: "dev@livy.incubator.apache.org" < > dev@livy.incubator.apache.org> > > >> > > Date: 08/03/2017 12:56 PM > > >> > > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy > > >> > > ------------------------------ > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi, > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > My preference would have been to not do a feature bearing first > > release > > >> > so > > >> > > that users could safely and painlessly migrate to the Apache > > release. > > >> > > Adding features increases the risk of regressions etc. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > However it seems like the web UI would be a relatively independent > > >> > feature > > >> > > that would not affect the core stability. So it may be fine to > > include > > >> > that > > >> > > in the first release as a new feature. In some ways, it gives > users > > an > > >> > > incentive to move to the Apache release. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > +1 for getting the first release out as soon as feasible. And > doing > > >> core > > >> > > feature work in follow up release. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On this note, it would be good to consider the question of release > > >> > > cadence. Should we move to a 3 month or 4 month release cadence > such > > >> that > > >> > > release trains are available for features to out when the features > > are > > >> > > ready. Or should do feature releases such that releases come out > > when > > >> > major > > >> > > new functionality has added. My preference is a time based release > > >> > cadence > > >> > > because it provides regular bug and security related fixes > available > > >> in a > > >> > > released form for end users. > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks! > > >> > > > > >> > > Bikas > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > ________________________________ > > >> > > From: Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com> > > >> > > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 8:34:03 PM > > >> > > To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org > > >> > > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy > > >> > > > > >> > > OK, thanks! Let's get this merged then prepare to the first Apache > > >> > release. > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Alex Bozarth < > ajboz...@us.ibm.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > There's two open PRs on the livy repo with a follow-up PR on the > > >> > website > > >> > > > repo: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy/pull/25 <- Web UI Log > > Page > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy/pull/26 <- Ability to > > build > > >> > > Livy > > >> > > > Docs > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy-website/pull/7 <- Add > > Livy > > >> > Docs > > >> > > > to Website (it may actually be better to update this and merge > it > > >> after > > >> > > the > > >> > > > release) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Once the Log Page PR is merged the basic Web UI is complete, the > > >> > > remaining > > >> > > > UI JIRAs are feature adds and tests that can come in the next > > >> release. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > *Alex Bozarth* > > >> > > > Software Engineer > > >> > > > Spark Technology Center > > >> > > > ------------------------------ > > >> > > > *E-mail:* *ajboz...@us.ibm.com* <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> > > >> > > > *GitHub: **github.com/ajbozarth* <https://github.com/ajbozarth> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > 505 Howard Street > > >> > > > San Francisco, CA 94105 > > >> > > > United States > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Saisai Shao ---07/31/2017 > > 07:12:11 > > >> > > > PM---Hi Alex, can you please list the JIRAs for UI related works > > >> > y]Saisai > > >> > > > Shao ---07/31/2017 07:12:11 PM---Hi Alex, can you please list > the > > >> JIRAs > > >> > > for > > >> > > > UI related works you want to merge in 0.4 release? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > From: Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com> > > >> > > > To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org > > >> > > > Date: 07/31/2017 07:12 PM > > >> > > > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy > > >> > > > ------------------------------ > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Hi Alex, can you please list the JIRAs for UI related works you > > want > > >> to > > >> > > > merge in 0.4 release? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thanks > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Alex Bozarth < > > ajboz...@us.ibm.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > After some tweaking and opening of PRs today, I'll change my > > vote > > >> to > > >> > a > > >> > > +1 > > >> > > > > with the inclusion of my currently open PRs. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > *Alex Bozarth* > > >> > > > > Software Engineer > > >> > > > > Spark Technology Center > > >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > >> > > > > *E-mail:* *ajboz...@us.ibm.com* <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> > > >> > > > > *GitHub: **github.com/ajbozarth* < > https://github.com/ajbozarth> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > 505 Howard Street > > >> > > > > San Francisco, CA 94105 > > >> > > > > United States > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for "Alex Bozarth" ---07/28/2017 > > >> > 01:01:16 > > >> > > > > PM---I'm a +0 on this, I think we should get in a release > > >> soon,]"Alex > > >> > > > > Bozarth" ---07/28/2017 01:01:16 PM---I'm a +0 on this, I think > > we > > >> > > should > > >> > > > > get in a release soon, but I'm not sure if we should wait > until > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > From: "Alex Bozarth" <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> > > >> > > > > To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org > > >> > > > > Date: 07/28/2017 01:01 PM > > >> > > > > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy > > >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I'm a +0 on this, I think we should get in a release soon, but > > I'm > > >> > not > > >> > > > > sure if we should wait until the Web UI and Documentation are > > >> > finished > > >> > > > > (tracking in *LIVY-87* <https://issues.cloudera.org/ > > browse/LIVY-87 > > >> > > > >> > > and > > >> > > > > *LIVY-384* <https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/LIVY-384>). If > > >> others > > >> > > are > > >> > > > > fine releasing with these feature partially complete then I'll > > be > > >> > okay > > >> > > as > > >> > > > > well. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > *Alex Bozarth* > > >> > > > > Software Engineer > > >> > > > > Spark Technology Center > > >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > >> > > > > *E-mail:* *ajboz...@us.ibm.com* <ajboz...@us.ibm.com> > > >> > > > > *GitHub: **github.com/ajbozarth* < > https://github.com/ajbozarth> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > 505 Howard Street > > >> > > > > San Francisco, CA 94105 > > >> > > > > United States > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Jeff Zhang ---07/28/2017 01:12:24 AM---+1 for making the first > > >> apache > > >> > > > > release. Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com>于2017年7月28日周五 > > >> 下午3:42写道： > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > From: Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> > > >> > > > > To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org > > >> > > > > Date: 07/28/2017 01:12 AM > > >> > > > > Subject: Re: To release a first Apache version Livy > > >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > +1 for making the first apache release. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Saisai Shao <sai.sai.s...@gmail.com>于2017年7月28日周五 下午3:42写道： > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Team, > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > We have already done most of the migration works to Apache, > I > > >> think > > >> > > it > > >> > > > > > would be better to have a first Apache release based on the > > >> current > > >> > > > code. > > >> > > > > > What do you think? > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks > > >> > > > > > Saisai > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > -- > > Marcelo > > > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
