On 2017-06-12, Matt Sicker wrote: > That's an interesting use case. Are you using gitpubsub instead of > svnpubsub for the site then?
"mvn site" plus manual copy over to svn plus the logging site's svnpubsub. Yes, it is painful :-) Stefan
On 2017-06-12, Matt Sicker wrote: > That's an interesting use case. Are you using gitpubsub instead of > svnpubsub for the site then?
"mvn site" plus manual copy over to svn plus the logging site's svnpubsub. Yes, it is painful :-) Stefan