[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16078961#comment-16078961
 ] 

Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1883:
-------------------------------------

I looked at the code and it seems to require Java 8. Frankly, what it is doing 
doesn't make any sense to me. It seems to be constructing nanoseconds from 
milliseconds, which would seem to me that it won't vary during the same 
millisecond. 

I really don't see any point in this until we implement something for Java 9.

> Timestamp does not seem to support microseconds level
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-1883
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1883
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Configurators
>         Environment: Linux with any JDK including JDK1.8
>            Reporter: Madhava Dass
>            Priority: Critical
>
> Used log4j and 'log4j2.xml' to configure timestamp format as:
> {code}
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <Configuration status="WARN">
>     <Appenders>
>         <Console name="Console" target="SYSTEM_OUT">
>             <PatternLayout 
> pattern="[%d{yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSXXX}{UTC}][%level][%logger{36}]:%msg%n"/>
>         </Console>
>     </Appenders>
>     <Loggers>
>         <Root level="DEBUG">
>             <AppenderRef ref="Console"/>
>         </Root>
>     </Loggers>
> </Configuration>
> {code}
> This pattern produces the time stamp as:
> {code}
> [2017-03-29T13:55:28.363000][null]:[Thread-1]: - <message>
> {code}
> The desired output is:
> {code}
> [2017-03-29T13:55:28.363701-07:00][null]:[Thread-1]: - <message>
> {code}
> Different versions of JDKs were tried including JDK 1.8. It does not seem to 
> make any difference in the outcome.
> Is there a way to get the desired time stamp through pattern matching 
> configuration in the '*.xml' file?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to