Same, git migration makes sense to me if we are fixing CVEs. -ck
> On Dec 20, 2021, at 14:28, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry, I forgot to vote explicitly. I'd be +1 on the git repo > migration, but I was also iffy on enabling issues there. > >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 1:23 PM Vladimir Sitnikov >> <sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Ralph>I have no problem doing stuff on GitHub >> >> Bingo! >> That is what I said earlier. >> >> It is really really demotivating that "PMC is not against". >> I suggested the move. Neither Ralph nor Matt welcomed the change with +1. >> >> At no time do I request you to perform the Git migration. >> At no time do I request you to refactor the build scripts. >> Yet you do ask A LOT before you even try doing something. >> >> That is exactly the reason I believe it is way less time consuming for all >> the parties to re-incubate 1.x >> rather than keep all those "But someone needs to migrate". >> >> Ralph>But someone needs to migrate it from SVN and I don’t have the time >> for that >> >> I can do that just fine. Would you just approve the move? >> Is it really that hard to respond with +1 on move to Git thread? >> What I get is -1(binding), and irrelevant comments like "someone needs to >> migrate". >> Thank you. I know someone needs to do that. >> >> The Git repository with the full log4j 1.x history already exists. >> I highlighted it on a "[VOTE] Move log4j 1.x from SVN to Git" thread: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0z34x9536mtr2z98m4s4dpqglzvjhjfq >> >> Vladimir
