Is https://github.com/apache/log4j a mirror of an SVN repo?
Gary On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 2:31 PM Carter Kozak <[email protected]> wrote: > > Same, git migration makes sense to me if we are fixing CVEs. > > -ck > > > On Dec 20, 2021, at 14:28, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sorry, I forgot to vote explicitly. I'd be +1 on the git repo > > migration, but I was also iffy on enabling issues there. > > > >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 1:23 PM Vladimir Sitnikov > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Ralph>I have no problem doing stuff on GitHub > >> > >> Bingo! > >> That is what I said earlier. > >> > >> It is really really demotivating that "PMC is not against". > >> I suggested the move. Neither Ralph nor Matt welcomed the change with +1. > >> > >> At no time do I request you to perform the Git migration. > >> At no time do I request you to refactor the build scripts. > >> Yet you do ask A LOT before you even try doing something. > >> > >> That is exactly the reason I believe it is way less time consuming for all > >> the parties to re-incubate 1.x > >> rather than keep all those "But someone needs to migrate". > >> > >> Ralph>But someone needs to migrate it from SVN and I don’t have the time > >> for that > >> > >> I can do that just fine. Would you just approve the move? > >> Is it really that hard to respond with +1 on move to Git thread? > >> What I get is -1(binding), and irrelevant comments like "someone needs to > >> migrate". > >> Thank you. I know someone needs to do that. > >> > >> The Git repository with the full log4j 1.x history already exists. > >> I highlighted it on a "[VOTE] Move log4j 1.x from SVN to Git" thread: > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0z34x9536mtr2z98m4s4dpqglzvjhjfq > >> > >> Vladimir >
