I also like this idea and agree with separate accounts for each component. On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 7:48 AM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great idea. I would suggest one account for the each component. I'm not > sure anyone but the PMC would care about a logging services account. > > Gary > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021, 17:40 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We recently had an idea discussed on a video call about potentially > > starting some Twitter et al. accounts for announcing releases, release > > candidates, and larger upcoming changes to subprojects (e.g., changing > the > > minimum major version of the underlying programming language or build > > tooling, major version releases like 2.x -> 3.x, etc). While the dev list > > remains our official place to discuss development, it would be immensely > > useful for communicating with our wider user base about changes that may > be > > more relevant to them than to active developers and contributors. > > > > What do you all think? If we do make accounts, would it make sense to > > divide them into accounts like @log4j, @log4net, @log4cxx, etc., or > should > > they be created like a common account for the whole Logging PMC? And > which > > social media sites would be best to use here? Twitter is an obvious > choice, > > but there could also be other tech-heavy social media sites that would > also > > benefit. > > -- > > Matt Sicker > > > > >
