It is on GitHub (both in git and zip at the release), but having checked out the svn repo at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/ on this machine, I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts that I added the other day, and that comes back to my question about them not showing up in the d/l locations :/ obviously, I'm doing Something Wrong.
I've re-committed from my linux machine - perhaps with better effect? -d On Jul 29 2022, at 10:37 pm, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > Also, is the web site being updated for the release. While not required for a > release we usually have a web site to review with a release. > > Ralph > > On Jul 29, 2022, at 1:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > > > Where is the zip of the source? The ASF releases source code. Binaries are > > for the user’s convenience. > > > > Ralph > > > >> On Jul 26, 2022, at 6:25 PM, Robert Middleton <rmiddle...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> The binaries won't show up under downloads.apache.org until actually > >> released(e.g. under repos/dist/release/logging/log4net). That can of > >> course only happen after the release is done via this vote. > >> > >> I'll take a look at it in a bit just to validate that the signatures > >> are good, as I know nothing about .net development. > >> > >> -Robert Middleton > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:45 AM Davyd McColl > >> <davyd.mcc...@codeo.co.za.invalid> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all > >>> > >>> It's been a while, but I've finally tied together some work in a 2.0.15 > >>> release for log4net. An rc tag is up at GitHub with details: > >>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.15-rc1 > >>> I've pushed docs to staging as well as binaries to > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net, however > >>> I don't see the 2.0.15 artifacts up at > >>> https://downloads.apache.org/logging/log4net > >>> > >>> This is probably why download links from > >>> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/download_log4net.html aren't > >>> working? > >>> > >>> @Ralph, I'd appreciate any assistance here - I'm probably missing > >>> something obvious ): > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> -d > > >
