Hi Gary, On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 16:30, Gary D. Gregory <ggreg...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2023/11/02 15:05:05 "Piotr P. Karwasz" wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:42, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > * `log4j-spring-boot`: > > > -1: Spring seems too important. > > > > Are you sure you want to _veto_ a module removal based on a feeling? > > `log4j-spring-boot` has 4 elements: a lookup, a property source, an > > arbiter and an improved version of `Log4j2LoggingSystem`. > > All these elements were submitted to Spring Boot by Ralph and included in > > 3.x. > > So this module targets the users that don't want Spring Boot 3.x, but > > want Log4j 3.x. > > I feel it is too big an ask to force people to migrate to 3.x which is not > released.
I am not sure I am following. You don't want to force Log4j 3.x users to migrate to Spring Boot 3.x? I think the pressure to migrate to Spring Boot 3.x will be higher than the pressure to migrate to Log4j 3.x. Piotr
