Ah, ok, then I'll abstain from voting until we have a version I can build locally.
TY for the heads up. Gary On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 2:24 PM Jan Friedrich <freeand...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hello Gary, > > https://paste.apache.org/1ropz looks like you're building 2.0.16? > Building the current version is currently very difficult due to the many > target frameworks: > net20;net35;net40;net40-client;net45;netstandard1.3;netstandard2.0 > You need to have each SDK for them and especially the old ones are really > difficult to install. > > In the next version (3.0.0) we have stripped these down to two: > net462;netstandard2.0 > Then it will be easy to build them on your machine. > > Regards. > > Jan > > Friday, March 15, 2024, 5:47:22 PM, you wrote: > > > What about the failure? > > > Gary > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024, 11:35 AM Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Hi > >> > >> Yes, everything should be done via npm scripts. So I should remove any > >> confusing .cmd files. > >> > >> As for the version, I should update that, but it's minor. That version > >> comes from package.json and will only show when running npm commands. But I > >> admit it's confusing. > >> > >> -d > >> > >> On 15 March 2024 16:28:47 "Gary D. Gregory" <ggreg...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> We might need better build instructions... for me at least ;-) > >>> > >>> I take it the build.cmd file should be removed since it's not mentioned > >>> in https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/blob/master/doc/BUILDING.md > >>> ? > >>> > >>> BUILDING.md contains a section called "TL;DR (!Windows):" which is too > >>> easy to confuse with "TL;DR (Windows):", just say "TL;DR (non-Windows):", > >>> there is no need to be clever here IMO. > >>> > >>> When I say "npm i" and then "npm run build", it starts with: > >>> > >>>> log4net@2.0.12 prebuild > >>>> run-s clean-build > >>>> log4net@2.0.12 clean-build > >>>> rimraf build > >>>> log4net@2.0.12 build > >>>> zarro @ > >>>> > >>> > >>> Why does it say log4net@2.0.12 when I am building 2.0.17? > >>> > >>> Then the build errors out with https://paste.apache.org/1ropz > >>> > >>> I, off course, don't know what I'm doing with .net... ;-) > >>> > >>> Gary > >>> > >>> On 2024/03/15 12:28:03 Davyd McColl wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> This is a vote to release the Apache Log4net 2.0.17. > >>>> > >>>> Website: > >>>> https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net/release/release-notes.html > >>>> GitHub: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net > >>>> GitHub release (pre-release): > >>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rel/2.0.17-rc1 > >>>> Distribution: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net > >>>> > >>>> Please download, test, and cast your votes on this mailing list. > >>>> > >>>> [ ] +1, release the artifacts > >>>> [ ] -1, don't release, because... > >>>> > >>>> This vote is open for 72 hours and will pass unless getting a > >>>> net negative vote count. All votes are welcome and we encourage > >>>> everyone to test the release, but only the Logging Services PMC > >>>> votes are officially counted. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks to Jan for basically doing all of this (: > >>>> > >>>> -d > >>>> > >>> >
