+1, i see no harm in a dormant state and only benefits from signalling this
to the outside world

On Thu, 3 Oct 2024, 20:28 Jan Friedrich, <freeand...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> On 2 October 2024 21:29:44 CEST, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >Hello everyone,
> >
> >We have discussed this in the past. I hope we can pick up a decent dev
> speed with Flume after we adopt it. I don't regret moving it into Logging
> Services, but we have not seen any significant movement.
> >
> >This message (private, please don't quote from it), on the other hand, is
> significant:
> >https://lists.apache.org/thread/b6ndsy30j239s3fw0o2tqwm9cwmv3801
> >
> >I want to call a vote to move Flume to dormant. Dormant means only it
> receives the Dormant label, and we move it to the dormant tab on our main
> website. This will give our users the correct information that we are *not*
> actively maintaining Flume. Dormant does not mean we are dropping it.
> Whenever PMC members or committers want to work on it, they can; when we
> see significant movement on the sub-project, we can label it as active.
> >
> >As I see it now, there is no active oversight or development. We, Logging
> Services, consider this dormant. For transparency and risk assessment, we
> need to be open about this status.
> >
> >Please vote:
> >
> >[] +1, label Flume as dormant
> >[] -1, don't label Flume as dormant because...
> >
> >Please consider voting ONLY -1, if:
> >
> > - you are willing to reply to the message linked above within the next
> 72 hours with helpful information (the usual timeframe to respond)
> > - AND you are willing to maintain this project in the next few months,
> which means upgrading dependencies, taking care of security, and -at least-
> acknowledging bug reports and responding to them
> > - AND you are willing to check, validate, and vote on a new release if
> it happens
> >
> >I would like to highlight that we are not changing code here; to me, this
> is a procedural vote. Since we need three PMC members to maintain a
> release, I consider this project active if at least three PMC members
> commit to the above.
> >
> >Kind regards
> >Christian
> >
> >--
> >The Apache Software Foundation
> >V.P., Data Privacy
>
> Jan

Reply via email to