On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> In 3.1 we dont remove QP from core, so lets fix it there. In 4.0 we can > possibly have a totally new QP with no backwards at all, so no problem. As > Earwin noted in another reply: His comment is the way QP should work, but > this is hard to do with analyzers in front (I would have some ideas). But > then we must do it without crappy javacc or jflex and with Analyzer only + > some self-coded stuff only. I don't want to "give up" on fixing this second whitespace problem until 4.0. Mostly because it prevents Lucene from having proper n-gram search where n-grams are word-spanning (this is the classic case that is well understood and gives good results for lots of Euro languages). So this is why i was against this option, because I want to fix this later too, and not make it impossible. -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
