I checked my existing lucene indexes. All the "ID" field are "stored" but not "indexed". I don't want to rebuild these indexes as it will take days. Can solr be changed a little let "ID" be "not indexed"?
Thanks. On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Scott Zhang <macromars...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi. Koji. > > Not sure how to set "uniqueKey" field in my lucene index. I am creating it > by using lucene.net > > Document doc = new Document(); > doc.Add(new Field("id", product_obj.product_id.ToString(), > Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED)); > doc.Add(new Field("type", "product", Field.Store.YES, > Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED)); > Field bField = new Field("keyword_level1", product_obj.title, > Field.Store.NO, Field.Index.ANALYZED); > bField.SetBoost(10.0F); > doc.Add(bField); > //keyword_level1 > doc.Add(new Field("keyword_level1", product_obj.sku, > Field.Store.NO, Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED)); > if (product_obj.is_zuup) > { > doc.Add(new Field("keyword_level1", "zuup", Field.Store.NO, > Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED)); > } > > > Regards. > Scott > > > > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Koji Sekiguchi <k...@r.email.ne.jp> wrote: > >> Are you sure you have uniqueKey field in your "lucene" index? Distributed >> search needs it. >> >> Koji Sekiguchi from mobile >> >> >> >> On 2010/06/08, at 15:52, Scott Zhang <macromars...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi. All. >>> I am coming from solr user mailing list. I got a problem with >>> distributed search. Looks it is BUG/ISSUE in solr itself. >>> >>> I am trying to use solr to search over 2 lucene indexes. I am >>> following the solr tutorial and test the distributed search example. It >>> works. >>> Then I am using my own lucene indexes. Search in each solr instance >>> works and return the expected result. But when I do distributed search using >>> "shards". It only return the "numFound"=14. But the result contain nothing. >>> >>> The doc in my existing lucene indexes, when search with distributed >>> search, none of them are returned. But the docs inserted from solr post.jar >>> are returned successfully. >>> Don't know why. looks the lucene docs has some difference from solr's >>> lucene. >>> And my situation is, I already have 72 indexes folders which occupy >>> lots of disk and repost them to solr will take very long time, so I have to >>> stick with my existing index. Is there a solution for this? >>> >>> >>> Thanks. >>> Regards. >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >