[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12889617#action_12889617 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2480: -------------------------------------------- I already opened LUCENE-2523 for this, but it's OK if we do the work here and resolve that one as a dup. I think you should see an IndexTooOldException instead of CorruptIndexException (though the former could subclass the latter?) > Remove support for pre-3.0 indexes > ---------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2480 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Index > Reporter: Shai Erera > Assignee: Shai Erera > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-2480-minimumsupport.patch, LUCENE-2480.patch, > LUCENE-2480.patch, LUCENE-2480.patch, LUCENE-2480.patch > > > We should remove support for 2.x (and 1.9) indexes in 4.0. It seems that > nothing can be done in 3x because there is no special code which handles 1.9, > so we'll leave it there. This issue should cover: > # Remove the .zip indexes > # Remove the unnecessary code from SegmentInfo and SegmentInfos. Mike > suggests we compare the version headers at the top of SegmentInfos, in 2.9.x > vs 3.0.x, to see which ones can go. > # remove FORMAT_PRE from FieldInfos > # Remove old format from TermVectorsReader > If you know of other places where code can be removed, then please post a > comment here. > I don't know when I'll have time to handle it, definitely not in the next few > days. So if someone wants to take a stab at it, be my guest. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org