On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Simon Willnauer < simon.willna...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I would appreciate creating two issues and use one only for reference > and link it by the one which contains patches and discussion if the > changes are large. Using SOLR- vs. LUCENE- I'd decide on a case by > case basis depending which "project" / "codebase" might undergo the > most significant changes. Generally, referencing the issues in > CHANGES.TXT sounds like a good idea. > > I don't think this is realistic. often a patch needs to change lucene and solr code in one commit. Personally, i don't waste any time thinking about whether the issue is SOLR or LUCENE, and I think two JIRAs is actually confusing. -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
