[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12913675#action_12913675
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2649:
---------------------------------------
bq. Hmm... I'd rather make an exception to 3.x, ie, allow the addition of this
method to the interface, than confuse the 4.x API, going forward, with 2
classes?
Same here, we already defined the FieldCache "interface" as subject to change.
Mabye we should simply remove it in trunk and only have a class? This interface
was never of any use, because you were not able to supply any other field cache
implementation (the DEFAULT field is *final* because all fields in interfaces
are defined as *final* by the Java Language Spec.
> FieldCache should include a BitSet for matching docs
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2649
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2649
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch,
> LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch,
> LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch,
> LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch, LUCENE-2649-FieldCacheWithBitSet.patch
>
>
> The FieldCache returns an array representing the values for each doc.
> However there is no way to know if the doc actually has a value.
> This should be changed to return an object representing the values *and* a
> BitSet for all valid docs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
