On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne.grinov...@gmail.com> wrote: > sake of brevity my impression is just confusion by people who are > trying to use it as it was an alias to svn. To put it boldly you're > missing the point :-) > > Would be good to see some "negative points" from someone who actually > used it for a significant time. >
And these are two typical quotes from git fantatics: they assume that the person complaining about their shitty tool knows nothing about distributed version control and is an idiot, etc, etc. Again, ive been using git on my day job for over a year. I've also used mercurial, which was extremely intuitive and usable (I think i came up to speed on this almost immediately). The problem is not that I havent used git, and its not that i'm missing the point of distributed VC. Git is just really done badly. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
