I was just thinking about the comments feature of the Solr Reference Guide (e.g. Confluence). On one hand it's a nice feature that also allows non-committers to be involved. But, over time, couldn't it easily get out of hand (as-implemented)? That is... as a series of ever-growing comments that make the page longer and longer, it seems it *could* become a bad thing over time. It isn't a problem now on the pages I've seen. It's easy to falsely make a like-kind comparison to JIRA issues but there is a big difference because JIRA issues become closed! A reference guide page will likely live forever. Perhaps my concern could be addressed in a presentational way, like if you consider that MediaWiki has a separate screen/page for this kind of thing; and as such I think is more manageable then growing the original page forever. I checked for a Confluence plugin for that but turned up nothing obvious in Atlassian's plugin marketplace.
So I may have commented on a page in the past but I have no intention in adding any more. If I have a comment; I'll make it on the dev list. ~ David ----- Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Reference-Guide-pages-turn-off-comments-tp4119062.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
