On 2/23/2014 10:49 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > On Feb 23, 2014, at 12:47 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Maybe delete comments that have been addressed after each release? > > +1 - a time delay seems like a good idea. Though the burden of work may make > the system less effective.
I have no idea what the paradigm I'm thinking of is called in programming, but it's very common in website design, and is inherent in the implementation of anacron. Describing it is harder than understanding it. :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anacron Rather than add a potentially unbearable task to the release process, we can review comments anytime a page requires a change. Anything that is no longer applicable can be deleted at that time. A good rule of thumb might be that we only keep comments that haven't been resolved or are resolved by the current minor release or its point releases. If it was resolved by the previous minor release or anything older, we delete them. There will be exceptions, but hopefully common sense can be the deciding factor. Thanks, Shawn --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
