On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote: > > b) that your argument against benson's claims seemed missleading: just > because Oracle is EOLing doesn't mean people won't be using OpenJDK; even > if they are using Oracle's JDK, if they are large comercial organizations > they might pay oracle to keep using it for a long time. >
Its not misleading at all, its being practical. If people want to use old jvm versions, good for them. But if they open a corruption bug with one of these "commercial" versions, then my only choice is to close as "wont fix". So they might as well just use an old lucene version, too. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
