[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12974229#action_12974229
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2829:
-------------------------------------
On further thought Yonik, your idea is really completely unrelated.
We shouldn't be seeking to terms/relying upon the terms dictionary cache
internally when we don't need to...
whether or not its populated with negative entries for the more general case is
unrelated,
even if we go that route we shouldn't be lazy and rely upon that.
> improve termquery "pk lookup" performance
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2829
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2829
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-2829.patch
>
>
> For things that are like primary keys and don't exist in some segments (worst
> case is primary/unique key that only exists in 1)
> we do wasted seeks.
> While LUCENE-2694 tries to solve some of this issue with TermState, I'm
> concerned we could every backport that to 3.1 for example.
> This is a simpler solution here just to solve this one problem in
> termquery... we could just revert it in trunk when we resolve LUCENE-2694,
> but I don't think we should leave things as they are in 3.x
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
