[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12977353#action_12977353
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2829:
--------------------------------------------

I think we should commit this, and if/when LUCENE-2694 and/or LUCENE-2831 are 
committed to 3.x, we can revisit it.

> improve termquery "pk lookup" performance
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2829
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2829
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2829.patch
>
>
> For things that are like primary keys and don't exist in some segments (worst 
> case is primary/unique key that only exists in 1)
> we do wasted seeks.
> While LUCENE-2694 tries to solve some of this issue with TermState, I'm 
> concerned we could every backport that to 3.1 for example.
> This is a simpler solution here just to solve this one problem in 
> termquery... we could just revert it in trunk when we resolve LUCENE-2694,
> but I don't think we should leave things as they are in 3.x

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to