[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14259419#comment-14259419
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-6892:
----------------------------------
The configuration is not going away. we will have the individuals URP
specified and configured. The point is , the chain does nothing extra.
Specifying the URP list at request time is no more complex than deciding the
chain name. It is not taking the power away but adding the power to mix and
match stuff at request time
> Make update processors toplevel components
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6892
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Noble Paul
>
> The current update processor chain is rather cumbersome and we should be able
> to use the updateprocessors without a chain.
> The scope of this ticket is
> * <updateProcessor> tag becomes a toplevel tag and it will be equivalent to
> the <processor> tag inside <updateRequestProcessorChain> . The only
> difference is that it should require a {{name}} attribute
> * Any update request will be able to pass a param {{processor=a,b,c}} ,
> where a,b,c are names of update processors. A just in time chain will be
> created with those update processors
> * Some in built update processors (wherever possible) will be predefined with
> standard names and can be directly used in requests
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
