[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14259567#comment-14259567
 ] 

Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-6892:
--------------------------------------

It might be instructive to look at how the search handler deals with search 
components and possibly consider rationalizing the two handlers so that there 
is a little more commonality in how lists of components/processors are 
specified. For example, consider a "first", "last", and full processor list. 
IOW, be able to specify a list of processors to apply before the 
solrconfig-specified list, after, or to completely replace the 
solrconfig-specified list of processors.

> Make update processors toplevel components 
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-6892
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6892
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Noble Paul
>            Assignee: Noble Paul
>
> The current update processor chain is rather cumbersome and we should be able 
> to use the updateprocessors without a chain.
> The scope of this ticket is 
> * <updateProcessor> tag becomes a toplevel tag and it will be equivalent to 
> the <processor> tag inside <updateRequestProcessorChain> . The only 
> difference is that it should require a {{name}} attribute
> * Any update request will be able  to pass a param {{processor=a,b,c}} , 
> where a,b,c are names of update processors. A just in time chain will be 
> created with those update processors
> * Some in built update processors (wherever possible) will be predefined with 
> standard names and can be directly used in requests 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to