[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2846: -------------------------------- Attachment: LUCENE-2846.patch sorry i had a piece of backwards logic in MultiNorms. of course all tests pass either way, which is why we need a good mixed-schema test (with RIW) for this issue before it can go in (no matter what we do) > omitTF is viral, but omitNorms is anti-viral. > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2846 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2846 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Robert Muir > Fix For: 4.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-2846.patch, LUCENE-2846.patch, LUCENE-2846.patch > > > omitTF is viral. if you add document 1 with field "foo" as omitTF, then > document 2 has field "foo" without omitTF, they are both treated as omitTF. > but omitNorms is the opposite. if you have a million documents with field > "foo" with omitNorms, then you add just one document without omitting norms, > now you suddenly have a million 'real norms'. > I think it would be good for omitNorms to be viral too, just for consistency, > and also to prevent huge byte[]'s. > but another option is to make omitTF anti-viral, which is more "schemaless" i > guess. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org