[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12981220#action_12981220
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2751:
--------------------------------------------
bq. There is a downside to this whole issue of course... i think its going to
be harder to reproduce test fails since we will be using more multithreading.
Right.
But I think this (losing reproducibility sometimes) is the lesser evil? Ie,
making sure we tease out thread safety bugs trumps reproducibility...
> add LuceneTestCase.newSearcher()
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2751
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2751
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2751.patch, LUCENE-2751.patch
>
>
> Most tests in the search package don't care about what kind of searcher they
> use.
> we should randomly use MultiSearcher or ParallelMultiSearcher sometimes in
> tests.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
