[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12990319#comment-12990319
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2751:
-------------------------------------
I think we are good to resolve this? I expect/hope for random
fails in the future that we will content with on a case by case basis!
Thanks for fixing it!
> add LuceneTestCase.newSearcher()
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2751
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2751
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2751.patch, LUCENE-2751.patch, LUCENE-2751.patch,
> LUCENE-2751.patch, LUCENE-2751.patch, LUCENE-2751.patch,
> LUCENE-2751_branch3x.patch
>
>
> Most tests in the search package don't care about what kind of searcher they
> use.
> we should randomly use MultiSearcher or ParallelMultiSearcher sometimes in
> tests.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
