On 3/25/2015 11:30 AM, Steve Molloy wrote: > I think something should be done about SOLR-7296 before releasing. > IMHO, having 2 implementations and completely unrelated APIs for > facetting is asking for problems down the road. So before exposing > this publicly, we should either align implementation or at least the > dev group needs to consciously make the decision to move ahead with > this, understanding the drawbacks.
Replying without understanding any of the facet code or how each implementation differs from the others: Because this has a heavy impact on low-level API code, I doubt that we can get this into 5.1. It might even be disruptive enough that we'll fork trunk into an issue-specific branch, do the heavy lifting, commit to trunk, and then backport after a suitable baking period. Thanks, Shawn --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
