Sorry - I didn't intend any offense with the precedent statement, only the fact that SOLR-6348 has released features already, namely SOLR-6351 and SOLR-6354 are in 5.0 already.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Timothy Potter <thelabd...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > That could be months of haggling and I don't think we should hold up all > the > > other nice features, improvements, and bug fixes for too much longer as > we > > don't want to slow down adoption of 5.x > > +1 > > > Without any judgement of what was done in SOLR-7214 and given that > SOLR-6348 > > has precedent, > > I'll disagree with the precedent bit... I worked on this stuff (and > presented it at ApacheCon) long before SOLR-6348 was opened. > > > why not mark the new JSON API as experimental, giving us > > freedom to unify the approaches over the next several releases? > > +1 for experimental - that had been my (uncommunicated) plan anyway. > We don't want to lock down APIs prematurely, it's really important to > get them right! > > -Yonik > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
