+1 Mike
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This will allow us to release 3x as frequent as we want, hold on w/ trunk as >> much as we want, and at some point cut over to 4.0 and think about the next >> big things we'd like to bring to Lucene. >> > > +1, this way development is simple: we are always working on the next > big release in trunk (for incompatible changes), and port compatible > changes back to the next minor release. > this seems to be working now, so lets stick with what works. > when we release 4.0, 3.x goes into bugfix-mode like 2.9 is now, we > start working on 5.0 in trunk, and open up branch_4x to backport > compatible changes (e.g. for 4.1) > > also, I think its simpler to users: no confusion such as 4.1 not being > able to read 3.4 indexes or similar silliness: to the users the > versions are still completely sequential. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
