[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542019#comment-14542019 ]
Karl Wright commented on LUCENE-6480: ------------------------------------- It also occurs to me that I don't fully understand how you intend to perform a fast search involving geo3d for records that are within a specified geo3d shape. Perhaps you could clarify in general terms how you would foresee doing that? I get that you are basically using recursive descent, intersecting with the ordering in the posting list, but then I get fuzzy. What kind of boolean decisions need to be made? Is membership of a point within the shape sufficient? Point me at the technique as written up elsewhere if you like... > Extend Simple GeoPointField Type to 3d > --------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-6480 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6480 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: core/index > Reporter: Nicholas Knize > > [LUCENE-6450 | https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6450] proposes a > simple GeoPointField type to lucene core. This field uses 64bit encoding of 2 > dimensional points to construct sorted term representations of GeoPoints > (aka: GeoHashing). > This feature investigates adding support for encoding 3 dimensional > GeoPoints, either by extending GeoPointField to a Geo3DPointField or adding > an additional 3d constructor. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org