[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987244#action_12987244
 ] 

Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-914:
------------------------------------

Checking if this issue can be resolved.
There were quite a few changes in this code:
* in LUCENE-584 skipTo was moved to DISI
* in LUCENE-1614 skipTo was replaced by advance() and the javadocs were 
refreshed.

Current javadocs of DISI.advance() are almost accurate to me, and I think this 
can be fixed by adding one more (first) note to the method, like this:
{code} 
* <b>NOTE:</b> this method is intended for use with <code>target &gt; 
current</code>, 
* otherwise it is not guaranteed to advance beyond current.
{code}

> Scorer.skipTo(current) remains on current for some scorers
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-914
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-914
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Doron Cohen
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: lucene-914.patch
>
>
> Background in http://www.nabble.com/scorer.skipTo%28%29-contr-tf3880986.html
> It appears that several scorers do not strictly follow the spec of 
> Scorer.skipTo(n), and skip to current location remain in current location 
> whereas the spec says: "beyond current". 
> We should (probably) either relax the spec or fix the implementations.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to