Hmmm. I pulled up this file in IntelliJ in my git checkout and viewed the history. It went back to March 17th 2010 (earlier than the 2012 you found) with git hash 3ee0ace1ba6b9bff3ffaa278c0bba07e6064057d with a commit message of: git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/newtrunk@924483 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 All files were added in that commit; it's the earliest commit in this git repo. This is the kind of thing I should be able to fix if I build a repo manually.
Side note: I used to be able to see the commands IntelliJ gave to git, but I don’t see it in the latest EAP anyways. I was wondering if it passed the an option to git log like --find-renames=40% to be more aggressive in its rename detection. On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:57 PM Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > And here is IndexWriter with initial revision in 2001, but again git > still only stops at Feb 7, 2012. > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java?view=log > > Revision 149570 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs] > Added Tue Sep 18 16:29:48 2001 UTC (13 years, 8 months ago) by jvanzyl > Original Path: > lucene/java/trunk/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexWriter.java > File length: 15076 byte(s) > > Initial revision > > So subversion history looks pretty complete. If we can add other > history from sourceforge, fantastic, but there isn't so so much going > on there. > > It is git that is totally broken here with respect to history. > > > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 4:39 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com > > <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> If we were to come up with a new git repo that doesn’t have the ‘.jar’s, > >> it’d be good to also streamline the history prior to the big Lucene + > Solr > >> merge due to the paths in source control as to where the trunk, > branches, > >> and tags lived. It appears the current repo may have been a blind git > >> import from subversion. And hand-done process that is mindful of these > >> things would result in a nice history. I’ve done this sorta thing once > (a > >> project at my last job) and volunteer to do it here if we can get > consensus > >> on a move to git. > > > > The current Git history is totally broken. This is a complete > > dealbreaker from my perspective, if its indicative of what svn -> git > > conversion will produce. > > > > Look at CheckIndex.java history in git: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commits/trunk/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java?page=5 > > It stops at Feb 7, 2012. > > > > In subversion it goes back to 2007, to the original issue where Mike > > added CheckIndex: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/CheckIndex.java?view=log > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
