On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to be clear, are you proposing to release 3.1 of Lucene, Solr, or > both?
Both: because our development is merged, I think it makes sense to merge release engineering too. The users can be mostly unaware of this: for example the generated artifacts are separate and posted on different websites. But I think we should branch/tag/generate RC's and releases together... I actually would propose we even have a single vote thread for the combined releases. I think this will result in higher quality releases because the 'whole thing' is what is tested by hudson etc, not solr with an older copy of lucene jar files. This is just my idea, if you are nervous about this speak up, we could alternatively create two separate release branches (one for lucene, one for solr) but I would really like to avoid this. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
