On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just to be clear, are you proposing to release 3.1 of Lucene, Solr, or >> both? > > Both: because our development is merged, I think it makes sense to > merge release engineering too. > > The users can be mostly unaware of this: for example the generated > artifacts are separate and posted on different websites. > But I think we should branch/tag/generate RC's and releases > together... I actually would propose we even have a single vote thread > for the combined releases. > I think this will result in higher quality releases because the 'whole > thing' is what is tested by hudson etc, not solr with an older copy of > lucene jar files.
+1 We can remain agile and deviate if necessary. -Yonik http://lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
